GitHub Action

The executable-stories-action posts your story output directly into pull requests. Each PR gets a collapsible Markdown summary as a comment and the full HTML report as a downloadable artifact.

It also supports release workflows:

• report — default PR report mode
• gate-release — compare a release candidate against a dev baseline
• deploy — record a deployment in the environment ledger

Works with all supported frameworks. Zero configuration for the common case.

Quick start

Add to your workflow after the test step:

- uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1

The action auto-detects your test output. No inputs are required for the default flow.

Prerequisites

The action does not run your tests — it surfaces the output of an executable-stories reporter that has already run. You need one of these set up first:

Framework	Setup guide
Vitest	Installation (Vitest)
Jest	Installation (Jest)
Playwright	Installation (Playwright)
Cypress	Installation (Cypress)
pytest	Installation (pytest)
Go	Installation (Go)
Rust	Installation (Rust)
Ruby (Minitest)	Installation (Ruby)
JUnit 5 (Kotlin)	Installation (JUnit 5)
xUnit (C#)	Installation (xUnit)

If your test command does not produce either reports/test-results.{html,md} or .executable-stories/raw-run.json, the action has nothing to surface and will fail with a “no reports found” error. See Troubleshooting.

How it works

The action checks for test output in two places, in order:

1. Pre-generated reports — if reports/test-results.html and reports/test-results.md exist (the default output from JS/TS framework reporters), the action uses them directly.
2. Raw run JSON — if .executable-stories/raw-run.json exists (the default output from non-JS adapters like pytest, Go, Rust, JUnit 5, xUnit), the action downloads the executable-stories CLI binary and generates the reports.

In both cases the action then:

• Uploads test-results.html as a workflow artifact
• Posts (or updates) a PR comment containing the markdown summary
• Sets outputs you can chain to subsequent steps

Examples by framework

All examples assume you already have an executable-stories reporter configured (see Prerequisites).

Vitest, Jest, Playwright

The reporter generates HTML and Markdown directly:

name: CI
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: 22
      - run: pnpm install
      - run: pnpm test

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        if: always()  # post the comment even when tests fail

Cypress

name: CI
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: 22
      - run: pnpm install
      - run: pnpm cypress run

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        if: always()

Python (pytest)

name: CI
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with:
          python-version: "3.12"
      - run: pip install -e ".[test]"
      - run: pytest

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        if: always()

Go

name: CI
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-go@v5
        with:
          go-version: "1.22"
      - run: go test ./...

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        if: always()

Rust

name: CI
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
      - run: cargo test

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        if: always()

Ruby (Minitest)

name: CI
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
        with:
          ruby-version: "3.3"
          bundler-cache: true
      - run: bundle exec rake test

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        if: always()

JUnit 5 (Kotlin)

name: CI
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-java@v4
        with:
          distribution: temurin
          java-version: "21"
      - run: ./gradlew test

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        if: always()

xUnit (C#)

name: CI
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
        with:
          dotnet-version: "8.0"
      - run: dotnet test

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        if: always()

Recipes

Always post the comment, even on test failure

Without if: always(), the action only runs if the previous step succeeded. For test feedback, you almost always want the comment to post even when tests fail:

      - run: pnpm test

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        if: always()

Multiple reports per PR

You can run the action more than once per workflow — for example, separate Vitest and Playwright suites that should each get their own PR comment. Use a unique comment-title for each invocation; the action looks for an existing comment matching <!-- executable-stories: ${comment-title} -->, so distinct titles produce distinct comments that update independently:

      - run: pnpm test:unit
      - if: always() && hashFiles('docs/evidence/vitest-tests.html') != ''
        uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        with:
          report-dir: docs/evidence
          output-name: vitest-tests
          artifact-name: executable-stories-vitest
          comment-title: Vitest Stories

      - run: pnpm test:e2e
      - if: always() && hashFiles('docs/evidence/playwright-tests.html') != ''
        uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        with:
          report-dir: docs/evidence
          output-name: playwright-tests
          artifact-name: executable-stories-playwright
          comment-title: Playwright Stories

The hashFiles(...) guards skip the action when a test suite produced no output (e.g. an earlier suite errored before writing).

Gate a release candidate

Use mode: gate-release when a release branch or release candidate must match the behavior already tested in dev:

jobs:
  release-gate:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: 22
      - run: pnpm install
      - run: pnpm test

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        with:
          mode: gate-release
          gate-dev-run: reports/dev.raw-run.json
          raw-run: .executable-stories/raw-run.json
          report-dir: reports/release
          output-name: rc-gate

The gate fails if scenarios from the dev baseline are missing from the release candidate, or if previously passing scenarios regress. Add gate-fail-on-new: "true" when new scenarios in the release candidate should fail the gate too.

Allowed exceptions can be stored in a policy file:

{
  "allowedOmissions": ["src-checkout-story-test--legacy-coupon-flow"],
  "allowedRegressions": []
}

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        with:
          mode: gate-release
          gate-dev-run: reports/dev.raw-run.json
          raw-run: reports/rc.raw-run.json
          gate-release-policy: .executable-stories/release-policy.json

See Release confidence for the CLI equivalent.

Record a deployment

Use mode: deploy after a deployment step to record which scenario set is now live in an environment:

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        with:
          mode: deploy
          raw-run: reports/prod.raw-run.json
          deploy-env: production
          deploy-tag: v2.4.0
          deploy-ledger: .executable-stories/deployments.json

The ledger is written in the job workspace. Persist it as an artifact, cache, or committed release-evidence file if another job should compare environments later.

Render screenshots inline in PR comments (opt-in)

By default, screenshots referenced in your stories stay in the HTML artifact only — the PR comment shows a 📎 alt (see HTML report) placeholder. This is because GitHub blocks data: URIs in comment markdown for security, so even a well-formed ![alt](data:image/png;base64,…) would not render inline.

To make screenshots render inline in the PR comment, opt in:

permissions:
  pull-requests: write
  contents: write          # required: action commits images on a dedicated branch

jobs:
  test:
    steps:
      # ...run tests...
      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        with:
          host-images: branch
          # images-branch: executable-stories-images   # optional, this is the default

What this does:

• Per PR run, the action commits each screenshot to an orphan branch (executable-stories-images by default) under pr-{number}/{run-id}/
• The PR comment is rewritten to use https://raw.githubusercontent.com/... URLs so images render inline
• The branch is created automatically on first use, with a small README explaining what it is. Old pr-*/ directories are safe to delete at any time
• If the upload fails (for example, contents: write is not granted, or a concurrent run races on the ref), the action falls back to placeholder mode and posts a warning. The comment still renders cleanly.

Concurrency note

The action commits using the GitHub Git Data API by referencing the branch’s current tip as the parent. If two PR runs touch the same images-branch simultaneously, the second updateRef call will fail with a non-fast-forward error and the action will fall back to placeholders for that run. There is no retry currently. For most repos this is rare; if you regularly run many parallel PRs and need bullet-proof inline images, give each workflow a different images-branch, or serialize PR runs with concurrency: group: ${{ github.ref }}.

Custom output paths

If your reporter is configured with custom outputDir or outputName:

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        with:
          report-dir: docs/stories
          output-name: user-stories

Pinned formatter version

Pin the executable-stories CLI version that the action downloads (only relevant for the raw-JSON path used by non-JS adapters):

      - uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1
        with:
          formatter-version: "0.7.3"

Using the action’s outputs

      - id: stories
        uses: jagreehal/executable-stories-action@v1

      - name: Echo report paths
        run: |
          echo "html: ${{ steps.stories.outputs.html-report-path }}"
          echo "md:   ${{ steps.stories.outputs.markdown-report-path }}"
          echo "comment id: ${{ steps.stories.outputs.comment-id }}"

Inputs

Input	Default	Description
mode	report	report, gate-release, or deploy
report-dir	reports	Directory containing or receiving generated reports
output-name	test-results	Base filename for reports (without extension)
raw-run	.executable-stories/raw-run.json	Path to raw run JSON
formatter-version	latest	Version of executable-stories binary (latest or semver, e.g. 0.7.12)
artifact-name	executable-stories-report	Name for the uploaded GitHub artifact
comment-title	Executable Stories	Header text for the PR comment; also used as the marker that lets the action find and update its own comment on subsequent runs
host-images	false	Set to branch to commit screenshots to an orphan branch and render them inline in the PR comment. Requires contents: write. See Render screenshots inline.
images-branch	executable-stories-images	Branch used when host-images: branch. Created as orphan on first use.
gate-dev-run	—	gate-release: dev baseline raw run JSON
gate-fail-on-regression	true	gate-release: regression check is enabled by default
gate-fail-on-removal	true	gate-release: missing-scenario check is enabled by default
gate-fail-on-new	false	gate-release: fail when the RC contains scenarios absent from dev
gate-release-policy	—	gate-release: path to allowed omissions/regressions JSON
deploy-env	—	deploy: environment name, e.g. dev, staging, production
deploy-tag	—	deploy: optional tag or release label
deploy-ledger	.executable-stories/deployments.json	deploy: ledger path

Outputs

Output	Description
html-report-path	Path to the generated HTML report file
markdown-report-path	Path to the generated Markdown report file
comment-id	Numeric ID of the PR comment that was created or updated. Empty string when the action runs outside a pull_request event.
gate-failed	true when gate-release detected a release gate failure
deploy-ledger-path	Ledger path written in deploy mode

Permissions

The minimum required permissions:

permissions:
  pull-requests: write   # post and update PR comments

If you opt in to host-images: branch, also grant contents: write so the action can commit screenshots to the images branch:

permissions:
  pull-requests: write
  contents: write

For PRs from forks, GitHub restricts the default GITHUB_TOKEN to read-only — see FAQ for workarounds.

What you see in PRs

Each invocation produces:

• A collapsible section in a PR comment containing the full Markdown story output
• A link at the bottom of that comment to download the interactive HTML report from the workflow’s artifacts
• (Optional, with host-images: branch) Screenshots rendered inline in the comment

On subsequent pushes to the same PR, the comment is updated in place rather than duplicated. Comments are matched by an HTML marker (<!-- executable-stories: ${comment-title} -->), so the same comment-title always updates the same comment, while different titles produce different comments (see Multiple reports per PR).

Troubleshooting

”No reports found”

The action’s first step says it could not find pre-generated reports or a raw run JSON. Causes:

• Your test command finished but did not write anything to reports/test-results.{html,md} or .executable-stories/raw-run.json. Check the reporter is wired up — see Prerequisites for the per-framework setup guide.
• You configured a custom output path. Match it with report-dir / output-name (or raw-run for the JSON path).
• The previous step (your test runner) errored before writing output, and you did not use if: always() on the action step.

The PR comment never appears

• Confirm the workflow has permissions: pull-requests: write.
• Confirm the action ran on a pull_request event (not a push to a branch — the action only comments on PRs).
• For PRs from forks, the default GITHUB_TOKEN is read-only by design; the action will silently skip the comment step. See FAQ.

Screenshots show as 📎 placeholders, not images

This is the default. GitHub blocks data: URIs in comment markdown, so inline base64 images would not render even if we left them in. Opt in to host-images: branch to render them inline.

host-images: branch warned and fell back to placeholders

Two known causes:

1. Missing contents: write permission. Add it to the workflow permissions block.
2. Concurrent run race. Two simultaneous workflows tried to push to the same images-branch and the second updateRef lost the race. There is no retry currently. Workaround: serialize PR runs with concurrency: group: ${{ github.ref }}, or use a per-workflow images-branch.

Schema validation failed from the formatter binary

Your raw-run JSON was produced by an older adapter than the formatter expects. Either upgrade your adapter, or pin formatter-version to a compatible version.

Comment is showing partial markdown / “Report truncated”

GitHub caps comments at ~65 KB. The action truncates at the last newline before 55 KB and adds a “Report truncated” note. The full content is in the HTML artifact. If you see this routinely, consider splitting suites with Multiple reports per PR.

FAQ

Does this work on private repositories? Yes. No external services are involved — the action runs entirely inside GitHub Actions and uses only the repo’s own GITHUB_TOKEN.

Does this work for PRs from forks? The default GITHUB_TOKEN for fork PRs is read-only, so neither the comment nor the orphan-branch commit can be written. Common workarounds: run the comment step under pull_request_target (be aware of the security implications), or use a workflow that gates on github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository.

Does this run my tests? No. The action surfaces the output of a reporter that has already run. See Prerequisites.

Can I customize the comment template? Not currently. The header is configurable via comment-title; the body is the markdown produced by the formatter. If you need richer customization, you can read the markdown via the markdown-report-path output and post your own comment with actions/github-script.

What permissions does GITHUB_TOKEN need? At minimum pull-requests: write. Add contents: write only if using host-images: branch. The action does not require any classic-PAT or app-token configuration.

Will the orphan images-branch grow without bound? Yes — there is no automatic cleanup yet. Old pr-*/ directories are safe to delete manually at any time (they are referenced by historical PR comments, but the comments degrade gracefully to broken-image icons). A cleanup recipe / retention input may land in a future release.

Where do I report bugs or request features? github.com/jagreehal/executable-stories-action/issues

Supported frameworks

Framework	Output type	Action config needed
Vitest	HTML + Markdown (via StoryReporter)	None
Jest	HTML + Markdown (via reporter)	None
Playwright	HTML + Markdown (via reporter)	None
Cypress	HTML + Markdown (via reporter)	None
pytest	Raw JSON	None
Go	Raw JSON	None
Rust	Raw JSON	None
Ruby (Minitest)	Raw JSON	None
JUnit 5 (Kotlin)	Raw JSON	None
xUnit (C#)	Raw JSON	None